Appeals against Tribunal decisions

Next post  Back to previous post

Local Military Service Tribunals were formed in each local authority, and within each county Appeal Tribunals were established to resolve disputes over local tribunal decisions. The final arbiter in difficult cases was a Central Tribunal, based in London, which also advised the Army Council regarding men who, having pleaded a conscientious objection, had been sentenced by court martial to terms of imprisonment for breach of military discipline.

Appeals against a local tribunal decision to the County Appeal Tribunal (Middlesex in the case of Hornsey, Tottenham and Wood Green) could be made by an individual making the application, usually the man himself, but sometimes his employer, or the Military Representative, who was a member of the Tribunal.

Appeals against the decision of the County Appeal Tribunal could be made to the Central Tribunal. In this case the man’s appeal in writing would be considered in light of previous advice given and decisions made along with other views from interested parties, including the Military Representatives attached to the Central Tribunal. The decisions handed down by the Central Tribunal were final.

Another avenue of appeal was via the High Court, which brought about the second Military Service Act of May 1916. In this case Frank Parton, a law student, was only granted exemption from combatant service by the Chertsey local tribunal and he appealed for an absolute exemption. Croydon Appeal Tribunal determined he did not even deserve an exemption from non-combatant service and the Central Tribunal denied any further appeal. Parton then took his case to the High Court in April 1916 that determined that the correct interpretation of the Act was that exemption from combatant service was the sole exemption available to conscientious objectors. It was this unforeseen interpretation which, in part, caused the Government to pass the second version of the Act.

After the war, in 1921, the Ministry of Health ordered that all papers relating to individual cases of exemption, and all local MST minute books, should be destroyed as they were not considered of sufficient public value to justify preservation. The only exceptions were the Middlesex and Lothian appeals, which were to be preserved as examples. Recently a number of records have been discovered which survived the 1921 order and the National Archives produced a list of record offices holding these papers.

Next post  Back to previous post

10 thoughts on “Appeals against Tribunal decisions

  1. joanna316 June 6, 2019 at 11:41 am Reply

    These are all useful new posts. With respect to the Appeals records, would it be worth adding that some sets of records are turning up in various county archives?

    Joanna

    >

    Like

  2. Jennifer Bell June 6, 2019 at 12:31 pm Reply

    Notwithstanding the instructions to destroy records (correctly mentioned by John in this post) the order was not carried out in all cases – whether deliberately or simply by accident. This means that, happily, records have ‘turned up’ in various parts of the country and been used by researchers to discover more about their COs. It may be that yet more will be found!

    Like

  3. […] finding work of national importance. He must have accepted this decision he appears to have made no appeal against […]

    Like

  4. […] Register lists him as a 29 year old warehouseman who he appeared before Tottenham Tribunal and the Middlesex Appeal Tribunal but there is no record of him in the Middlesex papers.  He may, in fact, only have appeared at the […]

    Like

  5. […] from combatant service.   Since he never appealed this result and so did not appear before Middlesex Tribunal we have no Tribunal papers for him;  therefore we do not know what his motivation was for wanting […]

    Like

  6. […] in prison he appears before the Central Tribunal – on 23rd March. They find him to be a CO Class A and refer him to the Brace […]

    Like

  7. […] he did not appeal against Tottenham Tribunal’s decision to the Middlesex Tribunal we have no records for him to […]

    Like

  8. […] May he appeals, the application again being made by W A Simpson, because a test case heard at the Central Tribunal had decided that Christadelphians could be exempt, provided they took up work of national […]

    Like

  9. […] 1 March 1916. He was granted an exemption from combatant service against which he appealed to the Middlesex County Appeal Tribunal, which on the 27 March 1916 withdrew his certificate of exemption. The Middlesex appeal records for […]

    Like

  10. […] conscientious objector on the 16 March 1916. The tribunal refused to grant him an exemption and he appealed to the Middlesex Appeal Tribunal, which on 29 March 1916 rejected his claim. The Middlesex appeal records show that he was employed […]

    Like

Leave a comment